07/13/2020 / Review

As an educator who has revamped her teaching in the subject area of math, I was grabbed by the title of this book. Recently, Iâ€™ve begun incorporating more writing into other subject areas. Math at first seemed questionable but then became a necessity.

As I began to read *Why Write in Math Class? K-5*, I envisioned my students and how they responded when I began using this approach. What I have really enjoyed in this book are the many examples given, as well as the collaboration we see among teachers that is evident throughout.

As an educator who is always looking to grow in my teaching, I also realize how much there is to learn and how little time there truly is to read and explore. My approach to sharing this book with you will be to highlight what areas jumped out at me in hopes that youâ€™ll have some of the same â€śah haâ€ť moments and explore it in more depth yourself (read the first chapter here).

The title itself provides a great overarching question. In the introductory pages, Linda Dacey credits the authors of *Types of and Purposes for Elementary Mathematics Writing: Task Force Recommendations* for identifying the overarching goals â€śfor students to reason mathematically and to communicate ideas.â€ť (Casa et al. 2016.4)

Repurposing ELAâ€™s types of writing

The four types of writing usually taught in the English Language Arts classroom â€“ exploratory, informative/explanatory, argumentative, and creative â€“ can also be used in math lessons, simply repurposed. Dacey devotes five chapters in the book to helping teachers focus on using these four types explicitly in math. I found these chapters extremely helpful.

As an intermediate teacher, I also found it interesting to learn more about the use of writing in the primary grades. I thought about how valuable this practice is in the early stages of learning math. As a foundation, it provides an engaging way for students to express their thinking.

I was particularly drawn to chapter two, â€śDeveloping a Community of Math Writers,â€ť where Dacey discusses how â€śthis practice has strengthened studentsâ€™ conceptual understanding and their ability to view themselves as mathematiciansâ€ť (page 9). I also appreciated the comparison between what we ask our students to do in a writing workshop (such as using the steps of the writing process) to what writing may look like in math. I was in total agreement with Daceyâ€™s statement:

â€śIt is the students who are eventually in charge of what is written on the paper, how they engage in the writing process, and how they will respond to feedback received from others. We need to believe and help students believe that they can craft their own math narrativesâ€ť (page 15).

From exploration to explanation

In chapter four, â€śWriting to Explore,â€ť Dacey describes how learners can explore new thinking by looking at othersâ€™ writing. I found myself nodding my head in agreement as Dacey provided a fourth grade example of a student working out a fraction word problem by drawing a picture, or â€śmapping,â€ť and the idea of simply asking, â€ťWhat do you know?â€ť

In Darcyâ€™s example, as students worked on the same problem their teacher noticed the many differences in the drawings and maps. The next day the students were given othersâ€™ work so they could analyze and comment on it, offering suggestions, and also compare the other work to their own response. There is a dialogue provided between two of the students that demonstrates the level of engagement and understanding that occurs (pp 58-63).

Chapter five, â€śWriting to Describe and Explain,â€ť delves into explanatory writing. I believe this is one of the most important reasons to use writing in math. It allows students to explain their thinking, which is a great window into their understanding. Dacey points out that â€śYears ago, math problems often ended with *Show your work. *Today, it is more common to see *Explain your thinking*â€ť (page 68).

I have found in my own classroom that using the word â€śexplainâ€ť engages the student to identify key words and numbers that helped them problem solve. Explanatory writing is procedural, and as Dacey states,

â€śAllocating time in the middle of a series of lessons or unit for students to write about a procedure, strategy, or concept gives them a powerful way to make their thinking explicit and for teachers to gain important formative assessment dataâ€ť (page 73).

Inviting creativity to math class

Finally, I connected with chapter seven, â€śWriting to Connect Mathematics and Creativity.â€ť This is an area that I have applied in my own math classroom. On page 114 Dacey offers a â€śWord problem writing templateâ€ť that students can use to create a word problem. Examples of studentsâ€™ completed templates are offered and truly demonstrate each studentâ€™s thinking process. â€śConnections to Literatureâ€ť offers ways to motivate students toÂ write creatively in math (page 117). The ideas Dacey and her co-authors share incorporate using familiar stories and changing key details to create a math story.

I came across this title as I was beginning to incorporate more writing into my 5th grade math class. Dacey writes, â€śWhen teachers are excited about writing in mathematics and show students how it is beneficial, both in the moment and over time, their students get excited tooâ€ť (page 151). I couldnâ€™t agree more!

Kathleen Palmieri

Kathleen Palmieri is a National Board Certified Teacher, a National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Learning Facilitator, and a fifth grade educator in upstate New York. She reviews professional texts and writes education articles for Middleweb. As a writer with a passion for pedagogy, Kathleen's focus is on education practices and strategies, as well as her own experiences as an educator. She has presented at math conferences, writing workshops, actively collaborates in literacy projects, and networks globally.Â